Pages tagged "Climate"
Insidious Power Grab by the Gas Industry: Peak Environmental Bodies in Canberra to Oppose Offshore Petroleum Bill.
19th March 2024
Australia’s peak state and territory environmental bodies joined forces today at Parliament House to urge the Albanese government to withdraw an amendment to Australia’s offshore gas legislation that would displace the role of the Environment Minister, dramatically weakening oversight and accountability, and accord broad new powers to the Resources Minister.
Amendments to the Offshore Petroleum and Greenhouse Gas Storage Legislation Amendment (Safety and Other Measures) Bill 2024 would effectively grant the offshore oil and gas industry a free pass from national environmental laws.
Conservation Councils held a press conference with members of the parliamentary crossbench today, calling for the amendment to be scrapped, and for the Environment Minister to retain oversight of offshore oil and gas assessment and regulation.
They warned that the bill could pave the way to diminished rights to consultation for the community, First Nations people, and environment groups, as well as reducing environmental protections and oversight of the hazardous offshore oil and gas industry.
Jess Beckerling, Executive Director of The Conservation Council of Western Australia, said:
“This Bill is an insidious power-grab by the gas industry”
“There is no justification for granting a special carve-out for the climate-wrecking offshore oil and gas industry from national environmental laws.
“It is clear that the oil and gas industry has been pushing hard for special deals, and it is incumbent on the Albanese Government to hold firm and not buckle to industry pressure.
“This change also threatens the rights of people to be consulted on offshore oil and gas projects. It would be deeply shameful if the Albanese government diminishes the rights to consultation, especially for First Nations people.”
Dave Copeman, Director of the Queensland Conservation Council, said:
“We want an Environment Minister and their Department making decisions on the environmental and climate impacts of offshore oil and gas
Kirsty Howey, Executive Director of the Environment Centre NT, said:
“The oil and gas industry is trying to rip up our federal environment laws, and putting at risk the rights of First Nations communities.”
“This is a climate crisis, and it is scandalous that the Australian Government is considering making special rules to suit one of the most polluting industries in the world.”
Jacqui Mumford, Nature Conservation Council of NSW said:
“ The Bill is the result of sustained lobbying from the offshore gas industry to weaken public consultation requirements to speed up the federal assessment process. It should be scrapped.”
Jono La Nauze, CEO of Environment Victoria said:
“The Bill gives preferential treatment to offshore oil and gas projects, enabling the Resources Minister to change offshore Environment Regulations without needing the endorsement of the Environment Minister, as required by the current regulatory framework”.
Statement Ends
Photos and a recording of the press conference are available here.
Attendees
-
The Queensland Conservation Council
-
Environment Centre Northern Territory
-
Environment Victoria
-
The Nature Conservation Council of NSW
-
The Conservation Council of South Australia
-
Independents
-
David Pocock
-
Zali Steggall
-
Zoie Daniels
-
-
Greens
-
Sarah Hanson Young
-
Dorinda Cox
-
Adam Bandt
-
Media Contact
Clancy Barnard: 0438 869 332
Doublespeak with a devastating impact – proposal to destroy and burn forest bad for nature and the climate
MEDIA RELEASE
18th March 2024
The proposal to burn native forests to produce electricity has again reared its ugly head, this time seeking to capitalise on NSW’s 'do what you want’ approach to habitat clearing.
Verdant Earth is seeking to secure 850,000 tonnes of wood per year from forests and bush in the Hunter region, in order to restart Redbank Power Station as a biomass generator (the burning of wood and other organic matter for fuel).
The company has been making misleading claims to the media about the proposal, which if approved will lead to large scale habitat loss across the Hunter region.
The Environmental Impact Statement for the project, currently available for public exhibition, also contains a range of deceptive and misleading claims, in particular that the proposal would “help decarbonise the electricity system” and “be ecologically sustainable”.
The Nature Conversation Council of NSW, the state’s leading environmental advocacy organisation, vehemently refutes both claims, and is calling on the NSW Labor Government to deliver on their election commitment and disallow the burning of native vegetation for electricity.
"It's extremely concerning that this polluting project is again rearing its head, and has progressed to the public exhibition stage” NCC CEO Jacqui Mumford said today.
"It took a dedicated community campaign to stop them trying to use native forest timber, despite the clear health, environmental and climate impacts. Now they're back with a new plan to burn native forest by taking advantage of widely criticised land clearing rules.
“They seem to have decided that calling the wood “invasive native species” makes it more appealing to the public. As always with this company, what they are saying simply doesn’t stack up.
“There are barely any “invasive native species" in the greater Sydney, Hunter & Coastal regions, certainty not enough to run a power plant.
“Instead, the substance of this proposal is to burn native forests, bush, grasses and regenerated paddocks that landholders wish to clear and have deemed “invasive” without oversight.
"NSW Labor has had a longstanding commitment to close the National Party’s loophole that allows burning of native vegetation for electricity. So far, they have not acted upon this commitment.
“We urge the government to close this loophole, deliver on their commitment and provide certainty for industry and our forests”.
Statements attributable to Jacqui Mumford, NCC CEO.
On Carbon Emissions.
Verdant incorrectly claims that because trees sequester carbon when they grow, burning them is ‘net zero’, however:
-
Burning green wood chips emits 50% more CO2 per megawatt hour of energy produced than burning coal. See further research here
-
The proposal is to use biomass from land that has been cleared, not in forests that are going to regrow.
-
Even if the forests did regrow, logged forests store far less carbon than old growth forests, and they can take hundreds of years to sequester the carbon the logged trees stored.
"Verdant Earth been trying claim that woodfire power is "green” or "net zero” since they purchased the mothballed Redbank coalfired power station.
"How many times are we going to have to show that Biomass (the burning of wood for fuel) is not a net zero energy source.
“It generates more emissions per megawatt hour of energy than coal, dives habitat clearing and deforestation, and undermines investment in genuinely clear energy technology.
"If Verdant energy really wants to provide clean energy they should invest in proven technologies like wind and solar, rather than trying to burn wood and claim it's carbon negative."
On the ecological impact.
Verdant energy is seeking to exploit a loophole introduced by the former government that allows landholders to self-assess the ecological value of a piece of land, and then clear it with little to no oversight (see below). The NSW government is currently reviewing these laws.
“Since these changes were introduced in 2016, habitat clearing rates on freehold land have tripled, with an area 4x the size of Newcastle lost each year.
“Habitat clearing on freehold land is now the biggest cause of environmental loss in NSW, with 50 million trees and almost 100,000 hectares lost each year.
It has labelled “the main threats to the survival of species" in the most recent NSW State of the Environment Report
“This proposal will incentivise the clearing of even more habitat in the hunter region, further devastating fragmented and at-risk forest ecosystems”.
The amount of biomass needed to power a power plant is massive – 850 000 tonnes is more woodchips that the entire native forest logging industry produced in NSW.
The negative impacts on nature will be massive, with thousands of hectares of native forests and bush being cleared. The proposal acknowledges that logging and chipping will occur across a 300 km radius of the facility.
Statement ends
Media notes and background:
Exemptions under the Protection of the Environment Operations (General) Regulation 2021
*** Clauses in the Protection of the Environment Operations (General) Regulation 2021 prohibit the use of native forest biomaterials in electricity generation, but exempt certain types of native vegetation or woody waste from the definition of native forest biomaterials.
This enables exempt materials to be burned for the purpose of electricity generation. These exempt materials include
-
materials from various types of plantation forests
-
sawdust or other sawmill waste
-
waste arising from certain wood processing or manufacturing activities
-
trees cleared in accordance with a land management (native vegetation) code under Division 5 of Part 5A of the Local Land Services Act 2013 and all relevant Codes and Regulations (see Local Land Services).
Part 5A of the Local Land Services Act 2013 contains the self-assessment loopholes that has led habitat clearing triple since 2016.
A 2019 review by the Audit Office of NSW concluded that the new laws may not be responding adequately to environmental risks whilst permitting landholders to improve agricultural activities and identified significant delays in compliance and enforcement activity to address unlawful clearing.
Also in 2019, a review of the Framework by the Natural Resources Commission, but not publicly released until late March 2020, found that:
-
Clearing rates have increased almost 13-fold from an annual average rate of 2,703ha a year under the old laws to 37,745ha under the new laws
-
Biodiversity in 9 out of 11 regions is now at risk
-
Unexplained clearing has increased, with the NRC concluding “compliance frameworks are inadequate and high rates of clearing pose a major risk”
In August 2020, Environmental Defenders Office released its report Restoring the Balance in NSW native vegetation law - Solutions for healthy, resilient and productive landscapes. The report identifies 10 areas of regulatory failure and sets out a law reform pathway with 27 recommendations for reform.
Finally, in 2023 Ken Henry pointed to a lack of regulatory oversight in agricultural land clearing and inconsistent biodiversity outcomes in the statutory review of the Biodiversity Conservation Act (2016), in which he found that NSW nature laws are failing.
The NSW Labor Platform states:
Labor recognises that burning timber and cleared vegetation for electricity is not carbon neutral and is neither clean or renewable energy, and therefore forms no part of a credible strategy for reducing greenhouse gas emissions. Labor will introduce legislation prohibiting the burning of any forests and cleared vegetation for electricity.
Data from the Drax power station in the UK shows that biomass burning has increased particulate pollution by 400 percent since switching four of six boilers from coal to forest derived biomass, while power output has remained constant.
Further research on biomass as being bad for community health here.
Previous NCC submissions
Get off the gas: Victoria is quitting gas, NSW should follow suit
Get off the gas: Victoria is quitting gas, NSW should follow suit
28th July 2023
The Nature Conservation Council of New South Wales (NCC), the states leading environmental advocacy organisation, welcomes the Victorian Government’s decision to quit gas in homes and government buildings, and urges NSW to follow their lead.
The Victorian Government announced today that from January 1st 2024, new homes and government buildings won’t be permitted to have gas connections.
This move will save consumers money, replace gas with more efficient alternatives and reduce greenhouse gas emissions.
“The Victorian Government has signalled with this decision that there is no place for gas in a clean energy future and NSW should follow their lead,” said Nature Conservation Council CEO Jacqui Mumford.
“NSW Labor committed to developing a gas substitution roadmap and associated policy measures at their 2022 Conference, so now is the perfect time to get that underway.”
“Quitting gas will accelerate the clean energy transition in NSW and will be critical in meeting the state’s emissions reduction targets of 70% by 2035.”
“Methane gas is a planet cooking fossil fuel 80 times more potent than carbon dioxide over 20 years. It is also the world’s fastest growing source of greenhouse gas pollution. We have clearly entered a dangerous phase of climate destabilisation and crisis. The earth is sending the message loud and clear: there is no time to waste.
“It’s time for the NSW Government to get serious, step up and take the bold action needed to address the climate crisis and ensure their commitments are met.”
Statements attributable to NCC Chief Executive Officer Jacqui Mumford
“Gas is expensive for the consumer and the planet. Gas prices will likely keep on rising and phasing out gas in homes will save households at least $1000 a year on their energy bills.”
“Gas is harmful to human health, when used in the home, it has been proven to be akin to exposing children to cigarette smoke. Cooking and heating with gas causes up to 12 percent of childhood asthma cases. Electrifying homes is a no brainer.”
Statement ends
Media contact: Anna Greer
E: [email protected] Ph: (02) 7208 9482
Note: NCC CEO Jacqui Mumford is available for comment on request
No time for delay: NSW Government needs to go all in on renewables
Tuesday 25th July 2023
The Nature Conservation Council of New South Wales (NCC), the states leading environmental advocacy organisation, has said that the NSW Government needs to get behind renewables and commit to closing coal-fired power plants on time.
A new report released by Nexa Advisory, outlines more options for closing coal-fired power plants on time by ramping up the renewable energy transition.
Nexa Advisory engaged Endgame Economics to provide evidence-based insights into the impacts of delaying the closure of coal-fired power. They found that consumers would pay $2,250-$3,000 more in electricity bills if the closures are delayed.
The report also found that delays to the closures mean we would miss our emissions targets, exceed our emissions budget as well as risk power affordability, reliability and security.
“There is no need to keep polluting coal-fired power plants open longer than planned,” said Nature Conservation Council Chief Executive Officer, Jacqui Mumford.
“Pouring hundreds of millions of dollars of public money into delaying the closure of aging, polluting power plants, is unacceptable when the alternative is to accelerate investment in renewables and save money for consumers.”
The report made a number of recommendations, including:
- Accelerating new capacity build by mobilising funding through the Federal Capacity Investment Scheme and Clean Energy Finance Corporation and the NSW EnergyCo
- Bolster firming capacity through accelerated auctions to bring on “insurance” supply in Renewable Energy Zones (REZ) and amended Long Term Storage Auction (LTESA) contracts
- Exploring long-duration storage technologies like flow batteries and liquid air energy storage to support renewable generation projects as well as delivering hybrid storage with generation projects
- Facilitate new renewable generation and storage projects outside the REZ to take advantage of existing capacity in the transmission system and underwrite Power Purchasing Agreements to ensure a more rapid delivery of new firmed generation projects
- Advocating for new transmission lines to support the clean energy transition, and making transmission contestability a requirement for accessing Federal funds for transmission projects
- Distributed energy resources (DER) can play a complementary role through residential rooftop solar, however commercial and industrial DER (systems >100kW) can play a significant role immediately, especially is the Small Scale Renewable Energy Scheme was increased from >100kW to >1,000K
Statements attributable to NCC Chief Executive Officer Jacqui Mumford
“The evidence from experts is mounting – two reports in the last week have shown what is possible if government has the willpower and the vision to ditch coal and go all in on renewables.
"What is needed now is bold nation-building action that signals to industry that the path ahead for renewables is clear.
“Delaying the closure of coal-fired power plants completely blows out our emissions budget, increases costs for the consumer and puts reaching the Federal Government’s renewable energy targets in doubt.
“There is no time to delay. Climate collapse is happening before our eyes. The government needs to act now to shore up the clean energy transition. We need a swift, orderly and strategic exit from fossil fuels.”
Statement ends
Media contact: Anna Greer
E: [email protected] Ph: (02) 7208 9482
Note: NCC CEO Jacqui Mumford is available for comment on request
Paying Aussies to pollute - Peak environment groups denounce Jemena Energy for incentivising gas switch
2nd June 2023
Paying Aussies to pollute - Peak environment groups denounce Jemena Energy for incentivising gas switch
While the Victorian and NSW state governments are implementing policies designed to break Australia's toxic gas addiction, one gas company is blatantly undermining these programs by offering customers cash incentives to switch appliances in their homes to polluting methane gas.
The Nature Conservation Council of New South Wales (NCC) and Environment Victoria, the leading environmental advocacy organisations from both states, have today criticised Jemena Energy for ‘gaslighting’ action on climate change by incentivising further burning of gas.
In the midst of a climate crisis, Jemena is offering financial incentives for NSW customers to switch everyday appliances from electricity to gas, while misleading the public about the benefits, impacts and future viability of methane gas as an energy source.[1]
“Gas is a fossil fuel that is a major contributor to the climate crisis”, Dr Brad Smith, NCC Policy and Advocacy Director said today. “Jemena is locking in carbon pollution by continuing to connect appliances in homes to fossil fuel gas infrastructure.”
"Every new appliance connected to gas locks in decades of guaranteed profits for Jemena, and decades of pollution for the rest of us. This company knows that its customers could save money and reduce pollution by switching to electric appliances, yet it is trying to lock people into a more expensive and destructive source of energy" Smith also said.
Bronya Lipski, Environment Victoria’s Policy and Advocacy Manager said that with winter temperatures dropping and gas bills rising, both states need a bold plan that supports everyone to electrify their homes, ensuring no one is left behind.
“In Victoria, the State government is offering initiatives through its Solar Victoria and Victorian Energy Upgrades programs to help people transition away from gas to energy efficient electric homes. But in NSW, this perverse scheme from Jemena is undermining such progress.”
“Across the country, people are waking up to the dangers of methane gas and the opportunity that electrifying our lives brings to cut climate pollution and power bills at the same time. But the powerful gas lobby is pushing back with everything they have. They are launching a multi-million dollar ad campaign to protect their record profits.”
“It is absurd and dangerous to see Jemena promoting gas appliances in this attempt to keep their dying industry afloat. We know that efficient electric appliances, powered by renewable energy are what's needed for a safe climate - not cash handouts to keep polluting.”
“The good news is that efficient electric appliances can save energy, reduce our bills and cut pollution, and with targeted government support, all households could be supported to switch to affordable, modern appliances.”
Statements attributable to Dr Brad Smith, NCC Policy and Advocacy Director:
“A safe climate for our kids means electrifying all homes by 2035. Every new gas appliance makes this mission harder and more expensive.
“The NSW government needs to follow the lead of states like the ACT and Victoria and should develop a gas substitution roadmap, so that rather than purchasing polluting gas appliances, households can switch to cheaper, clean, renewable energy.”
“The use of gas in homes is also exposing Australian children to a higher risk of asthma.” [2]
“Cooking with gas causes up to 12 percent of childhood asthma cases.”
“This means a child living in a home with gas cooking faces a similar risk of asthma to a child exposed to cigarette smoke in their home”
Environment Victoria Policy and Advocacy Manager Bronya Lipski also noted:.
“Our states are facing cold conditions, rising cost of living pressures, and exorbitant energy bills. Gas wrecks our climate, damages our health and is our most expensive form of energy. Yet Victoria burns more gas than any other state, and 60% of that is to heat our homes.”
“But the gas lobby is pushing back with everything they have. They are launching a multi-million dollar ad campaign to protect their record profits. This is industry propaganda designed to deflect attention away from climate and health science, and directly challenge government ambition to ensure emissions reductions and renewable energy targets are met.”
Background information
[1] Jemena, the gas pipeline operator for NSW, is offering a $500 cashback to customers who replace an existing non-methane gas (“natural gas”) appliance with a methane gas appliance. For details see: https://www.gonaturalgas.com.au/claim-your-cash-back
[2] Climate Council, Invisible Danger: Gas, Asthma and our Children, 2021
Statement ends
Media contact:
NSW Nature Conservation Council
Clancy Barnard
E: [email protected] Ph: 0438 869 332
Environment Victoria
James Norman
Media and Content Manager
MOBILE: 0451 291 775
Note: NCC CEO Jacqui Mumford and Bronya Lipski, Environment Victoria Policy and Advocacy manager are available for further comment on request
Coal-fired power station’s future under a toxic cloud as NSW EPA finds it has been operating illegally
The NSW Environment Protection Authority today gave Vales Point coal-fired power station on Lake Macquarie two years to come into compliance with the state’s clean air laws, after it found the power station's previous rolling exemption to the laws was illegal.
Read moreLithgow becoming clean energy hub as coal-fired generator turns to batteries
Today Lithgow takes another leap toward being a clean energy hub with EnergyAustralia announcing a new mega-battery at its coal-fired power station site.
Read moreOrigin saves 87 million tonnes of climate pollution with Eraring closure
Origin’s announcement that it will close its Eraring power station in 2025 is a sign of the unstoppable momentum of change to cleaner and cheaper energy, according to the Nature Conservation Council.
“Origin’s announcement is a ray of hope for leaving a safe climate for our children," said Nature Conservation Council Chief Executive Chris Gambian.
Singlehandedly, this announcement will avoid up to 87 million tonnes of climate pollution. That is more than the annual emissions of 167 countries, including Austria, New Zealand, and Greece.
"Origin's announcement means that over the next three and a half years, NSW’s clean energy industry will boom to ensure there is sufficient clean energy generation to continue bringing down power bills.”
“There is over $100bn of investment interest in clean wind, solar and batteries in the Hunter Renewable Energy Zone alone.”
“We need the NSW and Federal governments to step up and get the batteries, solar and wind farms, and transmission lines up and running by 2025 to ensure a seamless transition.”
“NCC welcome’s Origin’s commitments to provide tailored transition support to its workers, and to invest in new battery and pumped-hydro plants in NSW to provide clean energy on demand.
Background information:
Eraring Power Station, situated on the shores of NSW’s Lake Macquarie is the largest coal-fired power station in Australia.
Over the last five years, the Eraring power station emitted 69 million tonnes of CO2, making it the second largest climate polluting facility in NSW, narrowly behind AGL’s Bayswater power station which emitted 72 million tonnes of CO2 over the same period. It averaged 13.9 million tonnes per year over the same period, approximately 2.8% of Australia’s entire domestic emissions.
Table: Climate pollution from NSW coal-fired power stations
Source: Greenhouse and energy information by designated generation facility, Clean Energy Regulator
Sources:
Coal power station emissions: Clean Energy Regulator, Greenhouse and energy information by designated generation facility
Australia annual emissions: 499 mt, National Greenhouse Gas Inventory
Government fails to rule out burning native forest for electricity
The Nature Conservation Council is deeply disappointed that the NSW Government hasn't done more to plug loopholes and shut down attempts to marketise our native forests in its response to the Sustainability of energy supply and resources in NSW inquiry.
Jacqui Mumford, Deputy Chief Executive of NCC: “The NSW Government has missed an opportunity to provide additional protections to our increasingly vulnerable native forests, and the wildlife they support.
“Burning trees for electricity is backwards; it destroys habitat for NSW’s iconic species and is dirty, costly and unnecessary.
“When the government says that only native forest residues are allowed to be woodchipped and burnt to generate electricity, they don't say that this can include entire trees.i
“Proposed projects such as the Verdant Biomass Power Station in Singleton, if approved, will create a market for bulldozing smaller and wonky trees that should be left standing in the forest to provide critical habitat to koalas and other species.”
The Verdant Biomass Power Station in Singleton could burn 850,000 tonnes of biomass per year, sourced within 300km of the Singleton. It could see a massive increase in native forest logging on the north coast of NSW, if the Perrottet government neglects to amend the definition of wood residues.
“This report comes only a week after the koala was uplisted to endangered, and was a real opportunity to take a step in the right direction.
“This Inquiry made it clear that the Protection of the Environment Operations (General) Regulation 2009 must be amended to close loopholes that allow native forests to be woodchipped and burnt for electricity. The Government has ignored the advice of experts.”
Coal communities urgently want governments to step up and support clean energy transition and coal clean-up: poll
As Australia’s ageing fleet of coal-burning power stations move closer to closure, an overwhelming majority of people polled in the Latrobe Valley in Victoria and Hunter region of NSW agree that state and federal governments need to urgently step up to support both coal communities and industries to transition to clean energy.
The new polling comes as Australia's top polluter AGL prepares to deliver its 'market update' tomorrow, expected to include new climate targets and an earlier closure date for Loy Yang power station in the Latrobe Valley.
The YouGov poll, conducted for Environment Victoria and Nature Conservation Council of NSW, surveyed 600 people across the Latrobe Valley in Victoria and Hunter Valley in New South Wales.
It found a strong appetite for governments to take a more active role in supporting both communities and industry to transition to renewable energy, including ensuring that companies take responsibility for the toxic legacy of their coal power stations and mines.
The poll found that, across Hunter and Latrobe Valley:
- More than three quarters (76%) agreed that governments should do more to transition from burning coal to renewable sources of power to meet our future energy needs.
In Victoria’s Latrobe Valley:
- Nine out ten (90%) respondents agreed that as Victoria’s coal burning power stations and coal mines are closed down, the state government should ensure power station owners are responsible for the complete clean-up of sites so that they are safe and can be used for other purposes.
- Eight out of ten (80%) respondents agreed that governments should support heavy industry to switch to affordable, renewable energy to support local manufacturing sectors.
- Seven out of ten (70%) agreed that the state government should plan to retire old coal burning power stations over the next decade - with support for workers to retrain to be part of a solid economic future for the Latrobe Valley.
- A clear majority (57%) of respondents supported an early closure of Loy Yang if there is a solid plan to look after workers.
In NSW’s Hunter Valley:
- Eight out of ten of respondents (80%) agreed that the state government needs a plan to retire coal burning power stations in NSW over the next decade with support for workers to retrain to ensure a solid economic future for the local region.
- Just over three quarters (77%) of respondents agree that the NSW government should do more to transition from coal to renewables
- 68% of respondents agreed that so long as there is a plan to look after power station workers and the community, switching to renewable power over the next decade is the best option for NSW.
- Over nine in ten (91%) of respondents agreed that retired coal power stations need to be rehabilitated.
- 84% of respondents agree that the NSW government should support heavy industry to switch to renewable energy.
- A strong majority (68%) believe that when coal power stations are retired, renewables and batteries should replace them.
Jono La Nauze, Environment Victoria CEO, said:
“This polling shows the Latrobe Valley community is urgently calling for a plan that will enable Victoria to move towards renewable energy while supporting the workers and communities that have powered the state for decades.”
“It's time for our governments to step up and show they are serious about developing the new industries and technologies that will create new jobs in these communities and enable all Victorians to reap the benefits of a transition to clean, renewable energy.”
“With the Australian Energy Market Operator (AEMO) forecasting that all Victorian coal power stations could close by 2032, the need for a community-led transition plan is more urgent than ever.”
“Currently the Latrobe Valley Authority is only funded until mid 2022. We’re calling on the Victorian government to extend this funding until the last power station closes, and to work with locals to build a community-led transition plan for the region.”
“These results also make it glaringly clear that communities living close to coal mines want the state government to ensure that the private companies clean up their giant holes in the landscape and make them safe for future use.”
Jacqui Mumford, Nature Conservation Council acting Chief Executive, said:
“These results reveal many residents in the Hunter are looking toward a future beyond coal and waiting for politicians to support that change.”
“Pretending this energy transition isn’t happening helps no one. We need power station owners to come clean with realistic closure dates by 2030, so the community can plan ahead. We need all governments to take a much more active role in planning a transition for workers and the community”
“These results show that Hunter Valley locals want a clear plan to support our industries to make the switch to clean energy. It’s time for politicians to catch up with the community.”
Local community leaders in the Latrobe Valley region also welcomed the findings.
Tony Wolfe, senior operator at Loy Yang Power Station and Latrobe Valley community advocate, said:
“The owners of these sites have irreversibly changed the landscape while collecting massive financial rewards. The Latrobe Valley community deserves to have our land returned in pristine condition, and the State government needs to ensure sufficient training and support for displaced workers so they can convert to the new clean energy industries.”
“This presents a perfect opportunity to engage our local indigenous communities to guide us on the future stewardship of this land,” he said.
The Yougov phone poll was conducted on a representative sample of more than 600 Australian voters aged 18+ in the Latrobe Valley and Hunter regions.